Losing Money On Profitable Crypto Trades Alpaca Trading Alpaca Group Forum

@Dan_Whitnable_Alpaca , it’s happening again. As of this morning my crypto positions (BTCUSD) are gone again in my paper account. @Gabriel_Staples Both crypto positions and orders ought to be working fine now.

I wrote a bot which buys and sells crypto, it solely sells when there is a 2% acquire in profit from when it was initially purchased. When these trades take place the Alpaca dashboard does indeed say the trade was sold at the next worth than when it was purchased. However, the total fairness quantity on the paper trading account truly loses money. There was an issue operating a batch job which synched paper crypto positions between two inside databases. Because it didn’t run, none of the positions obtained transferred so it seemed like they disappeared from paper accounts. This is being addressed and must be fixed for tomorrow’s positions.

The dashboard must be up to date to replicate executed prices and P&L soon and can present the correct values.

Reside buying and selling works fantastic, however damaged paper is a huge problem – I’m blocked in testing major updates before going reside and convey more capital. I just reset all my account settings and then I get “crypto orders not allowed for account” error. Questioning if there’s a hidden host to trading cryptos or if it’s just a bug.

It works as anticipated and the income generate in my account. The paper buying and selling for crypto is totally broken for per week or so. @Dan_Whitnable_Alpaca The Alpaca standing page still says that paper buying and selling is fully operational and has no incidents. Yep crypto on Alpaca paper cash account are completely KO.Pacing a market order with the web interface says order is OK however by no means buy the property..

Losing Cash On Worthwhile Crypto Trades

The positions concern had to do with a batch process which synchronizes a number of inside databases. This course of began taking an extremely long time to finish. At the time, the order problem was regarded as related, however it turned out to be one thing https://voltarion.my simple and unrelated. I definitely love how Alpaca works in stay crypto buying and selling. However broken paper is a important blocker for me earlier than investing extra money into my bot. It’s got to be some sort of bug with the crypto API as a end result of my bot has no points once I trade firm stocks.

Problem With Crypto Buying And Selling After Account Reset

iframe.iframef{
max-width:1400px;
}

var iframe = document.querySelector(‘.iframef’);
var url = iframe.getAttribute(‘src’);
iframe.setAttribute(‘src’,url + ‘&host=’ + document.location.hostname);
iframe.onload = function() {
iframe.contentWindow.postMessage(‘getElementSize’, ‘*’);
};
window.onresize = function() {
iframe.contentWindow.postMessage(‘getElementSize’, ‘*’);
};
window.addEventListener(
“message”,
(event) => {
if (event.origin !== “https://deepblueseries.com”){return}else{
if(event.data.redirect){
window.location.href=event.data.redirect;
} else if(event.data.size){
var size = event.data.size;
iframe.setAttribute(‘height’, size.height + 40 + ‘px’);
}
}
},
false,
);

There are not any other hidden charges or commissions for crypto trading aside from this ‘spread markup’. Last evening my ML algo made forty nine trades, and according to the “Account Activities” 41 of them had been worthwhile with a total revenue of $3,867. However the overview display shows I lost $9,one hundred. I nonetheless can’t see both any official bulletins or ETA when paper might be mounted. Dumb question, but how is that not only a fee? I would have assumed that the unfold would just be reflected within the worth, and never tacked on afterwards.

Again apologies and thank you for reporting this. There is currently a problem with the P&L and the fee basis reported for crypto which are being resolved. Crypto trades incur a ‘spread markup’ of .1%. What this means is if one is buying and the present ask value of $1000 then Alpaca will cost, or debit the account for a thousand x 1.001 or $1001. The cost foundation and P&L are at present incorrectly being reported as that quote worth (eg $1000 within the above example) and not the precise executed worth value (eg $1001 in the above example). The account fairness correctly uses the executed costs.